Commands like @ say / get / read / ??? will be implemented?

Using DBF with CDX like:

INDEX ON TMCOD+ARCOD1 TAG ANARTI01 OF (USE_NAME) FOR !DELETED()
INDEX ON TMCOD+ARCOD2 TAG ANARTI02 OF (USE_NAME) FOR !EMPTY(ARCOD2).AND.!DELETED()
INDEX ON TMCOD+UPPER(ARDES+ARDES1)+AR_ARMAIN+ARCOD1 TAG ANARTI_S OF (USE_NAME)
INDEX ON TMCOD+TGCOD+TGCODS+ARK01+ARK02+ARK03+ARK04+ARK05+A RK06+ARK07+ARCOD1 TAG ANARTI04 OF (USE_NAME)
INDEX ON TMCOD+TSCOD+AR_LINEA+TGCOD+TGCODS+ARK01+ARK02+ARK0 3+ARK04+ARK05+ARK06+ARK07+UPPER(ARDES) TAG ANARTI05 OF (USE_NAME)
INDEX ON TMCOD+AR_ARMAIN+AR_ARMISU+AR_ARCOLO TAG ANARTI06 OF (USE_NAME) FOR !EMPTY(AR_ARMAIN)
INDEX ON TMCOD+UPPER(ARDES)+TSCOD+AR_ARMISU+ARK01+ARK02+ARK 03+ARK04+ARK05+ARK06+ARK07 TAG ANARTI07 OF (USE_NAME) FOR !EMPTY(TSCOD).AND.EMPTY(AR_ARMISU)
INDEX ON TMCOD+TSCOD+AR_LINEA+AR_ORDSTA+TGCOD+TGCODS+ARK01+ ARK02+ARK03+ARK04+ARK05+ARCOD1 TAG ANARTI08 OF (USE_NAME)
INDEX ON TMCOD+TSCOD+TGCOD+AR_ORDSTA+TGCODS+ARK01+ARK02+ARK 03+ARK04+ARK05+ARCOD1 TAG ANARTI09 OF (USE_NAME)
INDEX ON TMCOD+DTOS(AR_DATVAR)+TSCOD+AR_ORDSTA+TGCOD+TGCODS TAG ANARTI10 OF (USE_NAME)
INDEX ON TMCOD+ARFOR+TSCOD+AR_LINEA+AR_ORDSTA+TGCOD+TGCODS+ ARK01+ARK02+ARK03+ARK04+ARK05+ARCOD1 TAG ANARTI11 OF (USE_NAME)
INDEX ON TMCOD+AR_ARMAIN TAG ANARTI12 OF (USE_NAME) FOR !EMPTY(AR_ARMAIN)
INDEX ON TMCOD+AR_TRSEQ TAG ANARTI13 OF (USE_NAME) FOR !EMPTY(AR_TRSEQ)
INDEX ON TMCOD+IIF(EMPTY(AR_ARMAIN),ARCOD1,AR_ARMAIN) TAG ANARTI14 OF (USE_NAME)
INDEX ON TMCOD+AR_TRSEQ2 TAG ANARTI15 OF (USE_NAME) FOR !EMPTY(AR_TRSEQ+AR_TRSEQ2)
INDEX ON TMCOD+AR_ARMAIN+AR_ORDSTA+AR_ARMISU+AR_ARCOLO TAG ANARTI16 OF (USE_NAME) FOR !EMPTY(AR_ARMAIN)

creates problems.
Solutions?